Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Sasaki's avatar

I agree entirely, and have been reflecting on why the techno-optimist perspective falls flat these days, at least in my circles. And I have to admit, they bring up some fair counter-arguments. “Imagine you have a genius-level assistant in your pocket who helps you solve every problem,” I say. And they say, that sounds like the movie Her and pretty terrifying.

Or I offer unlimited renewable and nuclear energy without climate change, and they say we already waste more energy than is necessary.

What about living to 150 in good health? And they respond that it just puts more of a burden on young people, and there won’t be enough young people in the future, anyway.

How about space travel to Mars!? So we can make it the same Disney-like hellhole we’ve created in Venice? Or, alternatively: why travel to Mars when there is still homelessness and famine on our planet?

Even if we win the argument that science funding pays for itself many times over, I still struggle to describe a technological future that feels obviously better than the present, or even the recent past.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts